Skip to content
PeptideHound
Updated2026-10-05 · 49 compounds documented

Peptide research, protocols and vendor records

PeptideHound documents what published research reports for 49 peptide research compounds: what was studied, in what model, at what amounts, and what remains unknown.1

Reconstitution Calculator

mg · mL · U-100 units

Enter what is on your vial and the diluent you added. Arithmetic only; it never suggests an amount.

mg
mL
mcg
Your own figure
Concentration
—
mcg/mL
Volume
—
mL

mg × 1000 ÷ mL = mcg/mL
mcg ÷ (mcg/mL) = mL · mL × 100 = units

Enter all three values to see results.All calculators and the full method ↓

49 compounds1,529 citations linked203 vendor recordsUpdated How we source

Answered, with the papers behind it

Every page below states what the research found, labels the kind of study it came from, and says plainly what has not been studied.

All compounds →
Researched effects47 sources

Cerebrolysin Benefits: Measured Outcomes

The benefits measured for Cerebrolysin are gains on recovery scales in hospital patients: arm movement and speech after stroke, memory and global function in dementia, and coma and outcome scores after brain injury. Most were seen in the first weeks, and the longer-term and survival outcomes are weaker or absent.

Read the full answer →

Protocols39 sources

Cerebrolysin Dosage: What Trials Gave

Cerebrolysin trials measured it in millilitres of solution dripped into a vein, most often 30 mL a day for 10 to 21 days after stroke and 30 mL five days a week for four weeks in Alzheimer's disease. Those are amounts that hospital trial teams chose for patients with a diagnosis, reported here as study parameters.

Read the full answer →

Cognitive33 sources

Cerebrolysin: What the Research Shows

Cerebrolysin is a peptide preparation made from pig brain and given by infusion into a vein, used in hospitals in dozens of countries for stroke, brain injury and dementia. Its trial record is large, and the reviews of that record disagree about whether it helps.

Read the full answer →

Researched effects33 sources

LL-37 Benefits: What Was Measured

Every measured benefit of LL-37 comes from cells and animals: it improved wound repair in mice, calmed eye inflammation in rats and limited bacterial invasion of mouse tissue. None of the studies behind this page gave it to a person, so a human benefit has yet to be measured.

Read the full answer →

Metabolic / GLP-133 sources

Semaglutide (Ozempic, Wegovy): Trial Evidence

Semaglutide is a once-weekly injection that copies a gut hormone the body releases after a meal, and the human evidence behind it is unusually large and the approval is real. A 2023 review records that it was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for chronic weight management.

Read the full answer →

Metabolic / GLP-132 sources

C-Peptide: What the Blood Test Measures

C-peptide is not something anybody takes: it is a short piece of protein the pancreas cuts loose every time it makes insulin, and people search for it because of a line on a laboratory report. It is released one piece for every molecule of insulin, which is what makes the reading a count of what the pancreas is making.

Read the full answer →

Researched effects32 sources

Larazotide Benefits: What the Trials Measured

Larazotide (larazotide acetate, AT-1001) has measured benefits in one setting: symptom scores in adults with coeliac disease, most clearly when they were deliberately given gluten. The urine test of gut leakiness it was designed to improve did not differ from placebo in the pooled trials.

Read the full answer →

Healing & Recovery31 sources

Larazotide: What the Coeliac Trials Showed

Larazotide (larazotide acetate, also coded AT-1001) is an oral research compound built to tighten the seals between gut cells, tested mainly as an add-on to the gluten-free diet in coeliac disease. Across four randomised trials the picture was mixed: some symptom scores improved, while the gut permeability test it was designed to change did not.

Read the full answer →

Metabolic / GLP-130 sources

BAM15: What the Research Shows

BAM15 is a research compound that makes mitochondria burn fuel less efficiently, and the short version is that the mouse record is consistent while the human record, among the sources behind this page, has not started. It is a synthetic small molecule rather than a peptide, though it is sold and searched as one.

Read the full answer →

Safety & side effects30 sources

BAM15 Side Effects: What Is Documented

BAM15 has no human harm record among the sources behind this page, and what stands in its place is a set of mouse experiments that were measuring something else. That distinction is the whole page: an adverse effect nobody looked for is not an adverse effect nobody found.

Read the full answer →

Safety & side effects30 sources

Cerebrolysin Side Effects: What Is Documented

Cerebrolysin's harm record comes from placebo-controlled trials in stroke and dementia patients, which is more than most research compounds have. The reviews of those trials disagree: Cochrane found a possible rise in non-fatal serious adverse events, while other meta-analyses found no difference from placebo.

Read the full answer →

Cosmetic28 sources

Argireline: What the Research Actually Shows

Argireline (acetyl hexapeptide-8, also sold as acetyl hexapeptide-3) is a cosmetic peptide designed to copy the wrinkle-relaxing action of Botox from a cream rather than a needle. Whether it reaches the muscles it was designed for is unsettled, and the human trials behind it are small and a few weeks long.

Read the full answer →

What we don’t know

The gaps in the evidence matter as much as the findings.

  1. 01Whether most of these compounds do anything in a person. The majority of the evidence on this site is animal or cell work, and we label every claim with the study it came from.
  2. 02What is actually in an unregulated vial. Purity is verified only when an independent laboratory confirms it, which is why our vendor records track certificates rather than reputations.
  3. 03Long-term effects. Almost no compound here has been followed in people for longer than a single trial, and several have never been given to a person at all.

Compound index

Status is a regulatory fact, not a rating.

Full index →

Start here

For a reader who has not picked a compound yet — what these are, how they are used, and how they compare.

All guides →

Peptide calculators

Arithmetic, shown step by step. None of these tools suggests an amount to use.

All calculators →

Rising research interest

Twelve-month change in search interest. A rising line means more people are looking, not that a compound works.

  1. MOTS-c+1075%
  2. Retatrutide+645%
  3. GHK-Cu+594%
  4. Semax+583%
  5. CJC-1295+356%

Is a vendor legitimate? Check the record.

203 sellers on record; 68 have a completed record so far, checked against business registries, FDA enforcement and domain history. The rest are listed with no finding yet. Never a rating or a ranking.

All vendor records →

What are peptides?

A peptide is a short chain of amino acids — the same building blocks as a protein, just fewer of them. The body makes thousands of them, and they act as signals: telling a cell to release a hormone, to repair, to take in fuel.

That signalling is why they draw interest, and it is also why the category is so uneven. A few are approved drugs with large trials behind them. Most of the compounds people search for have been studied only in animals or cells, and some have never been given to a person at all. We label which is which on every page, because the difference is the whole story.

Every claim comes with a paper trail.

  • Cited, or not written

    Every claim carries the sentence from the source that supports it, checked character-for-character before the page can publish.

  • Evidence, labelled

    Each claim shows the kind of study behind it — human trial, animal model, cell work — so you can weigh it yourself.

  • What we don't know

    Every compound page says plainly what has not been studied. The gaps matter as much as the findings.

Editorial StandardsCorrectionsMedical Disclaimer

Recently reviewed

Pages are re-checked against their sources on a rolling basis. The date is when a person last read the page against the papers behind it.